I haven't written in just about three weeks and this is my first post for the month. I've gotten into my new routine and have fallen out of old habits and have neglected the internet. The new things I love: PVR, not having to work around other people when getting ready in the morning and the ability to lounge on the couch whenever I feel like it and take a nap. Things I'm so not loving: ants, Lucy wanting to leave the apartment, the noisy tenant above me and the fact that I no longer have a dishwasher.
So much has happened I don't know where to begin. I'll start with today and work backwards. Just got home from watching Repo Men. It's better than I had expected, less gorey than I imagined and a better story line than I thought it would be. Down fall, the supporting actress is so not hot and she was also the love interest and supporting actress in Daybreakers. Who is she and where did she come from and why is she in everything all of a sudden? The most important thing I want to mention about the movie is that Jude Law is a sexy sexy super sexy beast. I think he should do more action movies because they make him so manly and not the flakey guy that he probably is like in Alfie or Closer. A man as good looking as him, how could he stay monogamous? He should spread his hot genetics so there are more men who look just like him. He should share the love. Downfall of his looks in the movie was the Brooklyn track pants and jacket they put him in. He looked greas-ie dressed like a home slice with stripes on his pants.
Blockbuster in Boychuk is lame. There I said it. In fact. This is most likely the last time I go there for myself. They can suck it. Tomorrow, I'm going to say they can suck it a whole lot more eloquently, but I'm sure going to give them a hard time.
Since I'm not going to recap three weeks worth of my life, I'm going to note something I heard on CBC this evening on the news. As I'm sure you'll all aware of this, but most Canadians will not have saved enough money to live comfortably when they hit the age of 65. The part that killed me was what they considered a "standard" of living. Wait for it... wait... I'm living comfortably by Canadian standards when I can go to Cancun yearly. Really? We're all striving to save enough money so that we can go to Cancun every year for twenty years when we hit 65? F*** you. Just stop talking. Stop thinking. If that's our goal I might as well stop trying to achieve the standard of living because the last place I want to go to for two decades yearly is Mexico. That's some standard. Some s*** a** comment and standard. This is what we have come to. You have to have two cars, two car garage, two children, make 100,000 a year and travel to Mexico every year. How generic. I think I have lost faith. That's a lie, but I'm sure getting there.
One last note, I didn't get a chance to pick up my NM copy, but I will tomorrow or Sunday and while I'm whining to the even bigger whiners down in the boonies, I'm going to think of Peter Chao. Forget you A. He's funny and you not all that sophisticated and classy, so get off your high horse. "To each his own" bullshit, but then you dog on people who use stereotypes and act derogatory. Right there you're breaking the first rule of relativism "to each his own". Suck it. Suck your contradicting philosophy and the shit you spew out, because it is bullshit. I don't have time to argue with people who say "to each his own". I'm going to lump you up with everyone else now. It's a big lump and you just made it bigger.
CP outside mother-trucker.
No comments:
Post a Comment